스킵네비게이션

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 메인메뉴 국립장애인도서관홈페이지 바로가기

닫기

보존용자료이용 안내

닫기

책표지

검색히스토리

닫기

검색히스토리

* 보유한도 건수는 10건입니다.
검색히스토리 목록
자료구분 검색질의어 검색건수
     

상세검색

상세검색 닫기
자료구분 선택
단행자료
연속자료
멀티미디어자료
장애인자료
웹정보자료
선택된 자료구분
  • 자료구분 선택
도서 상세 검색
도서 상세 검색
분류기호 참조
청구기호 검색
한국대학명
코드명
대학명 참조
한국정부기관명
코드명
정부기관명 참조
도서 상세 검색
발행년도 년 부터
소장기관 검색
판종유형/판종
내용형식
KDC 주제
주제명을 이용한 검색

주제명을 통해 자료를 검색할 수 있습니다.

1. 주제를 입력하세요

주제명찾기
주제어 찾기

이용안내

검색방식 안내. 전방일치: 입력하신 키워드로 시작하는 주제어, 후방일치:입력하신 키워드로 끝나는 주제어, 부분일치:입력하신 키워드 포함하는 주제어

  • ① 검색방식
    • 전방일치- 입력하신 키워드로 시작하는 주제어
    • 후방일치- 입력하신 키워드로 끝나는 주제어
    • 부분일치- 입력하신 키워드 포함하는 주제어
  • ② 주제 입력란에 검색어를 입력하시고 [주제어 찾기]버튼을 클릭합니다.

2. 주제어를 선택하세요

목록

3. 주제어를 모아 검색할 수 있습니다.

선택된 주제명

[검색결과: 0건] 주제명을 선택하세요

학술기사

Why do people move to cohousing communities in Sweden? : are there any significant differences between the +40 cohousing and the mixed-age cohousing?

표제/저자사항
Why do people move to cohousing communities in Sweden? : are there any significant differences between the +40 cohousing and the mixed-age cohousing? / Jung Shin Choi
형태사항
p. 77-86 ; 30 cm
주기사항
수록자료: Architectural research : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. Architectural Institute of Korea. Vol.15 no.2(2013 June), p. 77-86 15:2<77 ISSN 1229-6163
저자: Jung Shin Choi, Professor, Department of Consumer and Housing Studies, The Catholic University of Korea E-MAIL: jjschoi@catholic.ac.kr
수록잡지명
Architectural research : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea.
청구기호
720.5-A673-15(2)
자료이용하는곳
3층 연속간행물실(서고자료대출반납)(보존)
자료 이용 방법
학술기사선택 => 바구니넣기 => 자료당일신청 후 [3층 연속간행물실(서고자료대출반납)(보존)] 에서 이용하십시오

초록내용/해제내용

인쇄

 Cohousing is based on collaborative network, or fictive kin in the community. It could facilitate the goal of self-sufficiency. This research aims to investigate the motivation of move to cohousing communities in Sweden, and to find out if there are any significant differences according to two different cohousing types; between the +40 cohousing and the mixed-age cohousing. The +40 cohousing is a kind of senior cohousing in which residents are supposed to be aged over 40. Questionnaire survey was applied and 242 collected data were analyzed by SPSS statistical program.
  Notable differences in demographic and dwelling variables are found between the 2 groups. There are more women, singles, academics, and small dwellings in the +40 cohousing than in the mixed-age cohousing. Referring motivation of move, “sharing common activity” and “idea of cohousing” are commonly noticed as the main reasons why people move to cohousing communities. Major difference between the 2 groups is that residents of the +40 cohousing tend to stress more on social interaction with neighbors than practical merit. On the contrary, ones of the mixed-age cohousing focus more on practical advantage than social interaction. As a conclusion, it is evident that motivation of move to cohousing communities is different by cohousing types, which have different residents’ characteristics.
  Cohousing could contribute to elevate marginal group’s quality of life as an alternative living environment. Therefore, cohousing design has to be tailored to adapt residents’ specific needs of different life-stages. In order to implement cohousing model into other countries, for instance into Korea, it needs to experiment with the notion of transplanting selected cohousing principles to a public housing development. In the mixed-age cohousing where more dual income families with young children than conventional housing developments reside, residents would need more practical advantage than emotional support in the community, while as residents in the senior cohousing need vice versa.


펼쳐보기

알림

닫기
바구니 담기가 완료 되었습니다.
‘바구니’로 이동 하시겠습니까?

퀵메뉴

  • 메일링서비스 신청
  • 협약도서관 안내
  • 사서에게물어보세요
  • 프로그램 다운로드
맨위로
  • 페이지 위로
  • 페이지 아래로